nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Jay Ashworth <jra () baylink com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:15:48 -0400 (EDT)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Parsonage" <eric () eparsonage com>
The assumption of a 1-1 correspondence between gender and sex is old fashioned nowadays.
Mammals have sex. *Words* (and only words) have gender. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra () baylink com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
Current thread:
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif), (continued)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Doug Barton (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) John Levine (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Howard (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)