nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys & dolls (a film motif)
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:36:48 +0000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guys_and_Dolls_(film) i -think- the term we are looking for is: Troglodyte 1: A person considered to be reclusive, reactionary, out of date, or brutish. /bill (top posting like a civilized human...) On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:28:04PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:57:36PM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote:I really wish people would get over themselves and get to work. Work is a place where things get done, not where people piss and moan about every single perceived slight they can come up with. AndrewI only wish you had used 'guys' instead of 'people' :) Ray
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Brian Christopher Raaen (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Rob McEwen (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral deleskie (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Kevin Carmical (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ben Bartsch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jason Baugher (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ray Van Dolson (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Doug Barton (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) John Levine (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Howard (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Landon Stewart (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)