nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Tim Franklin <tim () pelican org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:27:10 +0100 (BST)
Given the lack of truly neutral terms in english, I have taken to alternative my pronouns interchangably when I write.
"Folks"? I really do mean "folks" when I write "guys", but I do understand why it can come across as exclusionary, and I try to force myself into the habit of "folks". It sounds a bit odd in English, although not as archaic as "chaps", which I'm also guilty of; I'm assuming there's no additional cultural assumptions attached to "folks" in American? Cheers, Tim.
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Bjørn Mork (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)