nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:27:48 -0400 (EDT)
Note: this will be my one and only contribution to this thread.While this thread has generated some very interesting and thought-provoking discussions, I still think it strays pretty far from being on-topic for NANOG. That being the case, let's all get back to operating our respective networks and let this thread go.
Thanks jms
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Miguel Mata (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Cutler James R (Sep 27)