nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Rob McEwen <rob () invaluement com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:52:49 -0400
On 9/27/2012 2:47 PM, Brian Christopher Raaen wrote:
Here is the south we simply use "y'all".
That's what I was thinking. Also, btw, I disagree with that earlier comment about gender usage in the Bible, as least in regards to the New Testament. The Greek language of that time period is the most specific/nuanced/sophisticated language in the history of the world.... far more specific/nuanced/sophisticated than modern day European languages. -- Rob McEwen http://dnsbl.invaluement.com/ rob () invaluement com +1 (478) 475-9032
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jethro R Binks (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Larry Stites (Sep 27)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Lorell Hathcock (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Aled Morris (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Brian Henson (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral joseph . snyder (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jimmy Hess (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral JC Dill (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Brian Christopher Raaen (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Rob McEwen (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral deleskie (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Kevin Carmical (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ben Bartsch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jo Rhett (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jason Baugher (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Ray Van Dolson (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) bmanning (Sep 27)
- Re: guys & dolls (a film motif) Andrew D Kirch (Sep 27)