nanog mailing list archives
Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:25:57 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012, jim deleskie wrote:
I know that I should know better then comment on networks others then my own, ( and I know to never comment on my own publicly :) ) But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of caused this?
Is it plausible that Godaddy's internal network only normally has a few thousand BGP routes? 210 x a few thousand would run most modern gear out of FIB space.
The "my DNS is broken, are we really being DDoS'd on udp/53 at the same time?" thing, I've seen, and I can imagine it being very confusing to someone seeing it for the first time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Anton Kapela (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things jim deleskie (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things jim deleskie (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Hank Nussbacher (Oct 06)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things David Miller (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Jon Lewis (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Lane Powers (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things jim deleskie (Oct 05)