nanog mailing list archives
Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things
From: jim deleskie <deleskie () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 21:05:07 -0300
I know that I should know better then comment on networks others then my own, ( and I know to never comment on my own publicly :) ) But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of caused this? I won't even get into max-prefix and how we've managed this long with someone people still not setting them. -jim On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Anton Kapela <tkapela () gmail com> wrote:
Submitted without comment: http://inside.godaddy.com/inside-story-happened-godaddy-com-sept-10-2012/ -Tk
Current thread:
- max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Anton Kapela (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things jim deleskie (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things jim deleskie (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Hank Nussbacher (Oct 06)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things David Miller (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Jon Lewis (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things joel jaeggli (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things Lane Powers (Oct 05)
- Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things jim deleskie (Oct 05)