nanog mailing list archives
RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:10:05 +0000
Deaggregating to /48's is not a good idea, but giving an LIR a few bits (something like 3 or 4) to deaggregate makes sense. - Sander
+1 I wouldn't have a problem with a few bits of disaggregation. That seems reasonable for a network that might be subject to partitioning or doesn't have a fully meshed internal net.
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jared Mauch (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sascha Lenz (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mukom Akong T. (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Doug Barton (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)