nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: "Mukom Akong T." <mukom.tamon () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:47:45 +0400
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
1) absolutely must drop /48 de-aggregates from ISP blocks 2) absolutely must make RIR policy so orgs can get /48s for anycasting, and whatever other purposesItem 1 will be interesting. Item 2 is already done in ARIN and I think RIPE and APNIC. I'm not sure about AfriNIC or LACNIC.
AfriNC already does so. See http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/AFPUB-2007-v6-001.htm -- Mukom Akong [Tamon] ______________ “We don't LIVE in order to BREATH. Similarly WORKING in order to make MONEY puts us on a one way street to irrelevance.“ [In Search of Excellence & Perfection] - http://perfexcellence.org [Moments of TechXcellence] - http://techexcellence.net [ICT Business Integration] - http://ibiztech.wordpress.com [About Me] - http://about.me/perfexcellence
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jared Mauch (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sascha Lenz (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mukom Akong T. (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Doug Barton (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)
- RE: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leigh Porter (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 18)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)