RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

[George Bonser <gbonser () seven com>]

> Owen said:
>
> I'm not a big fan, either, but, I think that the concept of "be
> conservative in what you announce and liberal in what you accept" has
> to apply in this case. Since it is a common (quasi-)legitimate
> practice, arbitrarily filtering it is ill-advised IMHO.

While I agree in principle, 16 bits of disaggregation has the potential for a lot of mayhem and 32 bits (accepting /64 
from PA) would be catastrophic.  This would seem to be a case where upstream providers can assist the end user in 
obtaining their own PI space if they wish to multihome.  It would be in the provider's interest as it would reduce the 
number of potential complaints from customers concerning multihoming problems.

I filter /32 from PA space and am currently filtering one route but since the aggregate it is from has the same next 
hop and since I don't see the route from anyone else, I'm not worried about it.