nanog mailing list archives
Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!)
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:23:47 +0000
On 6/17/12 1:18 PM, "Jason Roysdon" <nanog.20110127 () jason roysdon net> wrote:
Jason, Will all MX get AAAA RRs, or at least all of your MX priority levels have at least one AAAA RR? Without a failure of mx2 & mx3, Sendmail and well-behaving mail servers are never going to try mx1.
Yes, in the relatively near future. - Jason
Current thread:
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!), (continued)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Livingood, Jason (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Seth Mos (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Vlad Galu (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Matthew Kaufman (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Paul Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Paul Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)