nanog mailing list archives
Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:12:29 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Randy Bush wrote:
the key question to me is when will my normal dns rbwls support ipv6? in exim-speak and this time let's skip the usual round of telling me the worth of each element of my selection.
My thoughts on this is that unless ISPs start to announce what "one customer" is, this is pretty hard. It's a problem in IPv4, but even more so in IPv6.
Wouldn't it help a lot if there was a way to publish that "in this /42, there is one customer per /56, and in this other /42, there is one customer per /48"?
How can that be done via DNS (if that is still a favourable mechanism to distribute information like this)? Whois is not a good way...
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!), (continued)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Livingood, Jason (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Livingood, Jason (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Seth Mos (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Vlad Galu (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 (was spam!) Matthew Kaufman (Jun 05)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Paul Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Paul Vixie (Jun 10)
- Re: Our first inbound email via IPv6 Randy Bush (Jun 10)