nanog mailing list archives
Re: Admin? Bueller?
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:22:24 -0400
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:16 PM, George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com> wrote:
I mean, really, if you are at provider X and provider X starts spamming the list, I would think you'd deal with that internally...
it's a tad rough to call what's happening 'spamming', it's surely 'sending off-topic mails to a list'. I'm not sure yahoo would classify (or most other folks) this as 'bad enough to ban the account' yet. the admins of the nanog-list could certainly take action though.
Current thread:
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity, (continued)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Admin? Bueller? Seth Mattinen (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Lynda (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Jon Lewis (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Joe Greco (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Matt Griswold (Jul 10)
- RE: Admin? Bueller? Kurt Ellzey (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? valdis . kletnieks (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? George Herbert (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? JC Dill (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Doug Barton (Jul 10)