nanog mailing list archives
Re: Admin? Bueller?
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:48:08 -0400
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:41:23 -0500, Matt Griswold said:
We were letting people practice their procmail :) They've both been filtered.
"both"? I only noticed one source account?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Admin? Bueller? Seth Mattinen (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Lynda (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Jon Lewis (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Joe Greco (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Matt Griswold (Jul 10)
- RE: Admin? Bueller? Kurt Ellzey (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? valdis . kletnieks (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? George Herbert (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? JC Dill (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Doug Barton (Jul 10)