nanog mailing list archives
Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity
From: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:23:47 -0400
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:16 PM, John Peach <john-nanog () johnpeach com> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:05:36 -0400 shawn wilson <ag4ve.us () gmail com> wrote:can some op filter this asshole?Please stop forwarding the whole message; I'd already dropped him in my procmail rules.
*shrug*, it needed a new thread since it ot of the originating thread. i feel that a maintained list should actively filter spam instead of expect users to setup their own filters. it's better for the list archives as well.
Current thread:
- *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Admin? Bueller? Seth Mattinen (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Lynda (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Jon Lewis (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Joe Greco (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Matt Griswold (Jul 10)
- RE: Admin? Bueller? Kurt Ellzey (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? valdis . kletnieks (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? George Herbert (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? Christopher Morrow (Jul 10)
- Re: Admin? Bueller? shawn wilson (Jul 10)
- Re: *spam* Fwd: U.S. spy agencies ... email for cybersecurity John Peach (Jul 10)