nanog mailing list archives
Re: job screening question
From: valdis.kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:09:54 -0400
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:07:57 +0100, Nick Hilliard said:
4) you get caught out in the interview as being puffed up, but the company hires you anyway despite strongly worded objections from the interviewer, causing the interviewer's eyes to spin in their sockets at the inanity of the decision. You then spend your entire employment at the company proving your ineptitude beyond all possible doubt. I think this is a win, is it?
Yeah - it's a better gig than you would have landed otherwise, isn't it? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: job screening question, (continued)
- Re: job screening question Owen DeLong (Jul 06)
- RE: job screening question Eric J Esslinger (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Ben Aitchison (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question valdis . kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Nick Hilliard (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question William Herrin (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question goemon (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question valdis . kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question jim deleskie (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Nick Hilliard (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question valdis . kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question George Herbert (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Steven Noble (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question George Herbert (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Steven Noble (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question William Herrin (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Mike Andrews (Jul 09)
- Re: job screening question Mike (Jul 09)
- Re: job screening question valdis . kletnieks (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Jon Lewis (Jul 06)
- Re: job screening question Doug Barton (Jul 06)