nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 00:14:20 -0500
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net> wrote:
It's 2012, we really shouldn't be seeing this type of thing anymore, particularly after what happened in Pakistan.
s/pakistan/pakistan,nyc(ntt),minneapolis(ntt),level3's incidents, .../ there's lots of people that have fallen victim of: o not having filters at all (pccw/pktel) o filtering using old/stale data (ntt/l3) why aren't filters applied at all? ("its hard, people keep asking me to update them, bah! work!") why aren't filter data bases kept up to date? ("its hard, i have to email something to radb/altdb/etc... bah, work!") why aren't checks of the filter data simple and mechanical? (and accurate?) ("Bah! work! plus, have you looked at the ouptput? bah! work!") resource certification would at least get us to the point where checking the data in the IRR is 'easy', it's not going to get people to PUT FILTERS ON CUSTOMER SESSIONS, and it's not going to get people to update their IRR objects (add AND DELETE!!!) -chris
Current thread:
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Alex Band (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges goemon (Feb 05)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges George Bonser (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Michael Hallgren (Feb 05)