nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:19:43 +0800
On Wednesday, February 01, 2012 02:57:46 AM Tony McCrory wrote:
Surely something is better than nothing. Advertise the /24's and the /25's, see what happens.
The fact that the hijacking ISP's upstreams accepted routes through their network that didn't belong to that ISP is bad enough. That we should still be able to advertise anything without an appropriate filter being in place and expecting it to work (even if it's with good intention, as in this case) is equally as bad. A big fail to our community, for up to this day, not implementing basic routing and forwarding filters that would do away with all this cruft in the first place. Clearly the Youtube/Pakistan/PCCW incident has long been forgotten. But that's life, I guess... Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Alex Band (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges goemon (Feb 05)