nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:02:09 -0700
On 04/06/2012 08:49 AM, George Herbert wrote:
This seems like a very 1999 anti-spam attitude. I have been doing anti-spam a long long time - literally since before Canter and Siegel (who I had as customers...) and before jj () cup portal com. It's not 1999 anymore. Patrick is not the enemy. Your attitude is worrying. The "I am not responsible for who uses the blacklist or what that means" isn't good enough anymore.
I wonder how long a popularish blacklist operator would last if they, oh say, blacklisted all of google or microsoft before they got some very threatening letters from their legal staff. An hour? A day? A week? You may have the right to list them and change your mind in your own good time, but they also have the right to defend their reputation civilly too. With great power comes great responsibility and all that. Mike
Current thread:
- SORBS?! Chris Conn (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Matt Kelly (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Paul Graydon (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! George Herbert (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! David Miller (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Mark Foster (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! chris (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)