nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: Brielle Bruns <bruns () 2mbit com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 08:54:49 -0600
On 4/4/12 3:36 PM, Landon Stewart wrote:
> It's best to not complain about it and just accept it as a fact of life > your IPs are listed on SORBS and move on. It's not the end of the world. >It turns into a customer service issue for most service providers.
Eh, guess they'll just have to absorb the cost of that, like its expected that the recipients of spam have to absorb the cost of ISPs not disconnecting infected/spamming customers...
And like how I have to absorb the costs of spending my time during the day answering removal requests from people who lie to me constantly and hope that I don't notice their little games.
Ever wonder why it takes time for DNSbl's to process removals, sometimes very long periods? Well, someone's gotta pay for that time the removal person does it (and I have yet to see a dime of compensation for the time I spend).
-- Brielle Bruns The Summit Open Source Development Group http://www.sosdg.org / http://www.ahbl.org
Current thread:
- SORBS?! Chris Conn (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Matt Kelly (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Paul Graydon (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! George Herbert (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! David Miller (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Mark Foster (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 06)