nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 19:38:13 +0900
i dont think anyone would miss sorbs if it was gone, dare i say it not even a single person
while i would not dispute what you think you think, i think you are thinking quite incorrectly randy
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS?!, (continued)
- Re: SORBS?! George Herbert (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Michael Thomas (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! David Miller (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Mark Foster (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Brielle Bruns (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jeroen van Aart (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! chris (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Randy Bush (Apr 07)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- The day SORBS goes away ... goemon (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... goemon (Apr 06)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Rich Kulawiec (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Hank Nussbacher (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Matthew Palmer (Apr 07)
- Re: The day SORBS goes away ... Barry Shein (Apr 07)