nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:01:02 -0600
That's probably a better idea. I moved "into" a /24 ip block that was SWIPed to me that they reported was "dynamic cable/DSL users" (no spam history, mind you). Didn't matter, I couldn't send e-mail. When trying to get it delisted I had a TTL on the zone that was "incompatible" with their standards (for DR failover purposes) and was unwilling to maintain a TTL of how many ever hours they wanted as it didn't fit the company's requirements. I ended up just getting a new IP block from the ISP as they gave up on resolving it too. Kind of a waste, but it worked. I relocated to there instead. 1 year later they updated my ticket and delisted it. On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 05/04/2012 17:48, goemon () anime net wrote:But they will care about a /24.I'm curious as to why they would want to stop at /24. If you're going to take the shotgun approach, why not blacklist the entire ASN? Nick
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS?!, (continued)
- Re: SORBS?! Jon Lewis (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Mike Andrews (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Alain Hebert (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 04)
- Re: SORBS?! Sam Oduor (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! goemon (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Jon Lewis (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Nick Hilliard (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! PC (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Brett Frankenberger (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Robert Bonomi (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! William Herrin (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! William Herrin (Apr 06)