nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS?!
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:18:59 -0400
On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 09:55:35 -0400, Drew Weaver said:
That is again, not true. Senderbase's listings don't correlate to any public information so it's pretty much impossible to pro-actively protect ourselves from having our IPs set to poor.
You missed the point - if it was industry standard practice, reputation lists at Senderbase, Spamhaus, and SORBS would *all 3* be out of business, because the average spammer's lifespan at a provider would be less than the time it takes the average reputation list to put up an entry.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: SORBS?!, (continued)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! goemon (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Landon Stewart (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Jon Lewis (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Nick Hilliard (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! PC (Apr 05)
- Re: SORBS?! Brett Frankenberger (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 05)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Jimmy Hess (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! Robert Bonomi (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! William Herrin (Apr 06)
- RE: SORBS?! Drew Weaver (Apr 06)
- Re: SORBS?! William Herrin (Apr 06)