Re: ouch..

[Mark Gauvin <MGauvin () dryden ca>]

Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I  
would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;)

Sent from my iPhone

On 2011-09-14, at 6:07 PM, "James Jones" <james () freedomnet co nz> wrote:

> On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don  
> > Gould wrote:
> > > How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web  
> > > site?
> > Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
> >
> > > * Does Juniper break promises?
> > Yes.
> >
> > > * Does Cisco break them?
> > Yes.
> >
> > > * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
> > It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
> >
> > > * What is the best technology for each company?
> > Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time.
> > Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
> >
> > > * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
> > Yes, but I can't afford it.
> >
> > Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate  
> > even the
> > thought of NAT444?
> >
> > :) :) :)
>
> Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.