nanog mailing list archives
Re: ouch..
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:46:51 -0700
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?
Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...
* Does Juniper break promises?
Yes.
* Does Cisco break them?
Yes.
* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?
It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.
* What is the best technology for each company?
Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.
* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?
Yes, but I can't afford it. Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444? :) :) :) -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: ouch.., (continued)
- Re: ouch.. Randy Bush (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Michael DeMan (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. David Swafford (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Ahmed Maged (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Paul (Sep 14)
- RE: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Michael Hare (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Don Gould (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leo Bicknell (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Don Gould (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Mark Gauvin (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. Joel jaeggli (Sep 17)