nanog mailing list archives
Re: ouch..
From: James Jones <james () freedomnet co nz>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:08:57 -0700
On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don Gould wrote:How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web site?Ok, I'll take a swing at your list...* Does Juniper break promises?Yes.* Does Cisco break them?Yes.* What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper?It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list.* What is the best technology for each company?Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty.* Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution?Yes, but I can't afford it. Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate even the thought of NAT444? :) :) :)
Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn.
Current thread:
- Re: ouch.., (continued)
- Re: ouch.. David Swafford (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Ahmed Maged (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Paul (Sep 14)
- RE: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Scott Weeks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Michael Hare (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Don Gould (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leo Bicknell (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Don Gould (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. James Jones (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Mark Gauvin (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 14)
- Re: ouch.. Leigh Porter (Sep 15)
- Re: ouch.. David Swafford (Sep 18)
- Re: ouch.. Joel jaeggli (Sep 17)