nanog mailing list archives
Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:38:17 -0400
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:17:22 -0000, Brian Johnson said:
So... I'm in complete agreement with your statement, but The Wikipedia reference is not pertinent.
So I point out the tragedy of the commons, you agree with it, but the Wikipedia reference that talks about the same exact thing isn't pertinent? How does that follow? :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers, (continued)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Douglas Otis (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Scott Howard (Oct 26)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Bjørn Mork (Oct 27)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Robert Bonomi (Oct 27)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 27)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Pete Carah (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Dave CROCKER (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Joel jaeggli (Oct 27)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers -Hammer- (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Jay Ashworth (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Dave CROCKER (Oct 30)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 30)