nanog mailing list archives

Re: 23,000 IP addresses


From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:26:16 -0400

On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson
<william.allen.simpson () gmail com> wrote:

Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to
me.

That's also roughly in line with Nextel and others for CALEA.

Hrm, I had thought that CALEA specifically removed the ability of the
Provider to charge for the 'service'? Though there is always the case
where the Provider can say: "Yes, this doesn't fall into the CALEA
relevant requests, we can do this for you though it will cost
time/materials to do, here's our schedule..."

or that's the stance a previous employer was taking... (at the
direction of their lawyer-catzen)


Current thread: