![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 11:26:16 -0400
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:16 AM, William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com> wrote:
Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to me.That's also roughly in line with Nextel and others for CALEA.
Hrm, I had thought that CALEA specifically removed the ability of the Provider to charge for the 'service'? Though there is always the case where the Provider can say: "Yes, this doesn't fall into the CALEA relevant requests, we can do this for you though it will cost time/materials to do, here's our schedule..." or that's the stance a previous employer was taking... (at the direction of their lawyer-catzen)
Current thread:
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Robert Bonomi (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses David Conrad (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Mark Radabaugh (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Allen Simpson (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Joel Jaeggli (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Message not available
- Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Luis Marta (May 10)
- Re: Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Owen DeLong (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Steven Bellovin (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Kevin Oberman (May 10)