Re: Regional AS model

["Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>]

On Mar 25, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:

> > Single AS worldwide is fine with or without a backbone.
> Only if you want to make use of ugly ugly BGP hacks on your routers, or, you don't care about Site A being
> able to hear announcements from Site B.

You are highly confused.

Accepting default is not ugly, especially if you don't even have a backbone connecting your sites.  And even if we 
could argue over default's aesthetic qualities (which, honestly, I don't see how we can), there is no rational person 
who would consider it a hack.

You really should stop trying to correct the error you made in your first post.  Remember the old adage about when you 
find yourself in a hole.

Another thing to note is the people who actually run multiple discrete network nodes posting here all said it was fine 
to use a single AS.  One even said the additional overhead of managing multiple ASes would be more trouble than it is 
worth, and I have to agree with that statement.  Put another way, there is objective, empirical evidence that it works.

In response, you have some nebulous "ugly" comment.  I submit your argument is, at best, lacking sufficient definition 
to be considered useful.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick