nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regional AS model
From: David Freedman <david.freedman () uk clara net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:49:32 +0000
Single AS worldwide is fine with or without a backbone. Which is "preferable" is up to you, your situation, and your personal tastes. (I guess one could argue that wasting AS numbers, or polluting the table with lots of AS numbers is bad or un-ashetically pleasing, but I think you should do whatever fits your situation anyway.)
Depends on your routing requirements, for example, you need to rely on a default or disable as_path checks (or re-write the path) to be able to see your other clusters (if they do need to communicate)... -- David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Group
Current thread:
- Regional AS model Zaid Ali (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Bill Woodcock (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Michael Hallgren (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Zaid Ali (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Michael Hallgren (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model David Freedman (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 25)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 26)
- Re: Regional AS model Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Regional AS model Nick Hilliard (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Dave Temkin (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Jeff Wheeler (Mar 28)