![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 21:41:05 -0800
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:54 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Hammer <bhmccie () gmail com> wrote:I need a cheat sheet. nat64 6to4nat 6in4nat etc...6to4 and 6in4 are not NAT. They're tunnels (VPNs) that allow two IPv6 nodes to talk to each other via an IPv4 backbone. nat64 is NAT. It allows IPv6 endpoints to communicate with IPv4 endpoints. nat44 is the IPv4 NAT you're used to. nat444 is carrier NAT (translated once by the customer and once again by the ISP, get it?)
More accurately: NAT44 is consumer NAT you're used to. LSN/CGN is NAT at the carrier level. DS-LITE is native IPv6 with private IPv4 tunneled over IPv6 to reach an LSN/CGN for IPv4 connectivity. NAT444 is NAT44 + LSN/CGN Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments, (continued)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Hammer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Randy Bush (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Mark Andrews (Mar 03)
- RE: Real World NAT64 deployments Frank Bulk (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments sthaug (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Tom Hill (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Bjoern A. Zeeb (Mar 04)