nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:27:18 -0500
6in4 == deprecated automatic tunneling mechanism ... HE is an example of manually configured Protocol41 encaps. And 6to4 doesn't allow IPv6 to talk to IPv4, contrary to what the name seems to imply :). Some poorly chosen names for our tunneling, yes? Thanks, TJ's Droid2 On Mar 3, 2011 6:27 PM, "William Herrin" <bill () herrin us> wrote:
Current thread:
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments, (continued)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- RE: Real World NAT64 deployments George Bonser (Mar 03)
- RE: Real World NAT64 deployments George Bonser (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Tom Hill (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Bjoern A. Zeeb (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments MAWATARI Masataka (Mar 07)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments TJ (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Leo Bicknell (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Karl Auer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments TJ (Mar 04)