![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
RE: Real World NAT64 deployments
From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk () iname com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 22:38:34 -0600
There's no assurance that the content provider will use the ISP's 6to4 relay. In fact, there's a good chance it won't use the ISP's 6to4 relay for return traffic. Frank -----Original Message----- From: Mark Andrews [mailto:marka () isc org] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 7:17 PM To: William Herrin Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Real World NAT64 deployments <snip> Any ISP that is delivering IPv6 to their clients would be insane to not run a 6to4 relays for return traffic to 2002::/16. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Hammer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Hammer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Randy Bush (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments William Herrin (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Mark Andrews (Mar 03)
- RE: Real World NAT64 deployments Frank Bulk (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments sthaug (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Hammer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Elliot Finley (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Tom Hill (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)