nanog mailing list archives
Re: Real World NAT64 deployments
From: TJ <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 06:54:31 -0500
Apologies, was thinking 6over4 ... And I still think we could have done better at naming these (DSTM, anyone?) Thanks, TJ's Droid2 On Mar 4, 2011 2:40 AM, "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> wrote:
He is mistaken... HE Tunnels are an example of 6in4 and it is not
deprecated,
but, some original mechanisms for 6in4 to which he may be referring were deprecated. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6in4 Owen On Mar 3, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Karl Auer wrote:On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 20:27 -0500, TJ wrote:6in4 == deprecated automatic tunneling mechanism ... HE is an example of manually configured Protocol41 encaps.Deprecated? Do you have a reference...? Thanks, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer () biplane com au) +61-2-64957160 (h) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob) GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687 Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Current thread:
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments, (continued)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Tom Hill (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Simon Perreault (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Bjoern A. Zeeb (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Francois Tigeot (Mar 04)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments MAWATARI Masataka (Mar 07)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments TJ (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Leo Bicknell (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Karl Auer (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments Owen DeLong (Mar 03)
- Re: Real World NAT64 deployments TJ (Mar 04)