nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's IRR Database
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:09:55 +0900
Now AS17557 start to announce a more specific: 208.65.153.0/24. Validators would classify this as Invalid (2).Would it be classified as invalid or unknown?
invalid
Or are both possible
no. the result is a single value
depending on whether 208.65.153.0/24 is signed?
<pedant=on> roas, which are signed by resource certificates, bind a prefix to a set of ASs. sorry to wax pedantic. but this stuff can get crufty, and getting the nouns and verbs correct will help us navigate. randy
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Dongting Yu (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Alex Band (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Arturo Servin (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jared Mauch (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Andree Toonk (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Christopher Morrow (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 31)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- Re: Level 3's IRR Database Martin Millnert (Jan 30)