nanog mailing list archives
Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark
From: JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 06:23:11 -0800
On 29/01/11 11:36 AM, Roy wrote:
On 1/29/2011 10:00 AM, Mike wrote:The rub is, that they want to legislate that web based 'speedtest.com' is the ONLY and MOST AUTHORITATIVE metric that trumps all other considerations
You took the state's money so you are stuck with their dumb rules.
As I read the OP's post, it's not a rule *YET* (they want to legislate...) and he's asking for help to convince them to adopt a better rule, which seems like a perfectly reasonable objective.
jc
Current thread:
- help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Mike (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Dan White (Jan 29)
- RE: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Jeff Richmond (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Christopher Morrow (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Roy (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark JC Dill (Jan 30)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Michael Painter (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Chuck Anderson (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Don Gould (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 29)
- RE: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Frank Bulk (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark - beware bufferbloat Jim Gettys (Jan 31)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Dan White (Jan 29)