nanog mailing list archives

Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark

From: "Michael Painter" <tvhawaii () shaka com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:25:49 -1000

Mike wrote:

The rub is, that they want to legislate that web based 'speedtest.com'
is the ONLY and MOST AUTHORITATIVE metric that trumps all other
considerations and that the provider is %100 at fault and responsible

for making fraudulent claims if speedtest.com doesn't agree.


speedtest.net?

Current thread:

help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Mike (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Dan White (Jan 29)
  - RE: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Jeff Richmond (Jan 29)
  - Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 29)
  - Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Christopher Morrow (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Roy (Jan 29)
  - Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark JC Dill (Jan 30)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Michael Painter (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Chuck Anderson (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Don Gould (Jan 29)
  - Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 29)
- RE: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark Frank Bulk (Jan 29)
- Re: help needed - state of california needs a benchmark - beware bufferbloat Jim Gettys (Jan 31)