nanog mailing list archives
Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 18:44:40 +0100
On 9 feb 2011, at 18:30, David Freedman wrote:
(yes, even ICMP TOOBIG can be filtered safely if you have designed things in a sane way)
NO. Even if you run with 1280-byte MTUs everywhere so you'd think path MTU discovery wouldn't be needed, this can still cause problems with IPv6-to-IPv4 translators.
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Mohacsi Janos (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Sam Stickland (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Owen DeLong (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 10)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 10)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Owen DeLong (Feb 09)