nanog mailing list archives
Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:11:32 -0800
On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:50 AM, David Freedman wrote:
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:On 9 feb 2011, at 18:30, David Freedman wrote:(yes, even ICMP TOOBIG can be filtered safely if you have designed things in a sane way)NO. Even if you run with 1280-byte MTUs everywhere so you'd think path MTU discovery wouldn't be needed, this can still cause problems with IPv6-to-IPv4 translators.Calm down, I think you misunderstand, I'm suggesting that you don't design your infrastructure in such a way that your backbone/infrastructure links ever have to receive TOOBIG messages from outside your AS and work with these, your backbone links are of course free to send TOOBIG out! Dave. -- David Freedman Group Network Engineering Claranet Group
Unless every packet you emit is ≤ the minimum MTU (1280), then, you need to be able to receive TOOBIG messages. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Mohacsi Janos (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Sam Stickland (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network sthaug (Feb 09)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Owen DeLong (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 09)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 10)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network David Freedman (Feb 10)
- Re: Too bigs are sacred, was: Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 10)
- Re: IPv6 addressing for core network Owen DeLong (Feb 09)