nanog mailing list archives

Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:34:19 -0800


On Feb 5, 2011, at 5:20 PM, Jack Bates wrote:

On 2/5/2011 7:01 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
And did you change the amount of growth space you allowed for each pop?
Were you already constrained in your IPv4 growth space and just restored
your desired growth margins?

Growth rate has nothing to do with it. ARIN doesn't allow for growth in initial assignments. No predictions, no 
HD-Ratio, and definitely no nibble alignments.

Yet.

Current policy proposal hopes to fix a lot of that.

Yes... 2011-3 for those who are interested in knowing more.

Owen



Current thread: