nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer () bfk de>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:58:43 +0000
* Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo:
The subject says it all... anyone with experience with a setup like this ?
Unicast addresses must be located in at least a /64 subnet. No doubt there are vendors which enforce this (perhaps even in the ASICs), so deviating from this rule will result in some lock-in. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer () bfk de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
Current thread:
- Re: What's really needed is a routing slot market (was: Using IPv6 withprefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN), (continued)
- Re: What's really needed is a routing slot market (was: Using IPv6 withprefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN) Matthew Petach (Feb 08)
- Re: What's really needed is a routing slot market Neil Harris (Feb 08)
- Re: What's really needed is a routing slot market Paul Timmins (Feb 08)
- Re: Telco style routing, was What's really needed is a routing slot market John Levine (Feb 08)
- RE: Telco style routing, was What's really needed is a routing slot market Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 08)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- RE: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Owen DeLong (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN Jack Bates (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN bmanning (Feb 05)
- Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN sthaug (Feb 03)