nanog mailing list archives

Re: And so it ends...


From: John Curran <jcurran () arin net>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:24:33 +0000

James -

    ARIN allows legacy holders to update their registration information, in fact, we even allow such via ARIN Online.  
No agreement is required with ARIN; we provide this service as well as WHOIS and reverse DNS without charge.

     If you no longer want to use your address space, you may return it, or transfer according to the community 
developed policies.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

On Feb 5, 2011, at 1:54 PM, "James P. Ashton" <james () gitflorida com> wrote:

John,
It seams that by stating "Note that ARIN can't allow transfers contrary to the
community-developed policy" that you intend to say that ARIN, based on your current policies and processes, will not 
actively update whois information for legacy block holders that either "sub-assign" or "Transfer" segments of their 
legacy space to another entity.

Is this the case?  If so, as many others seam to be asking, do you and the ARIN legal representatives, feel that you 
can actually legally follow this course and do you feel that, as you had nothing to do with the assignment of this 
space that you have any real right to deny these services. The community expects you to to have a certain quality of 
information in the database and not offering updating services can present operational issues to those of us using 
the database as intended. 

James



----- Original Message -----
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:

Having said that, it should be clear that I view ARIN "reclaiming" legacy addresses that aren't under contract (i.e. 
LRSA) as fraud, perhaps even in the legal sense of the word.  It might also be considered theft by some.  But 
outright reclaiming from ongoing address holders isn't a big concern of mine, because I doubt ARIN will go far down 
that path (if it goes at all).  My real concern is that ARIN might refuse to recognize legacy transfers, fail to 
update the Whois database, issue RPKI inappropriately, and cause real damage to live networks.  This would be bad 
for the networks that implement ARIN Whois-based policy, of course.  

Benson - 

ARIN provides legacy holders with WHOIS and IN-ADDR services without charge.
If a legacy holder simply wishes to make use of their resources and maintains 
current directory information, ARIN left them fairly undisturbed since its 
formation.  

Via the Legacy RSA, ARIN offers contractual assurances to legacy holders of 
ARIN providing these services, as well as certain protections from reclamation 
and policy changes.  Note that ARIN can't allow transfers contrary to the
community-developed policy, so legacy address holders who wish to do more
then just use their resources (e.g. transfer them) are encouraged to get
involved in the community to create policies that match their needs.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN




Current thread: