nanog mailing list archives

Re: quietly....


From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault () viagenie ca>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:46:06 -0500

On 2011-02-03 15:29, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 02:55:39 pm Jack Bates wrote:
Do you think we have to have a standard for them to implement it?

If they can ignore the CPE router rules, they can implement NAT66 on 
their own, too.

See the map66 Sourceforge.net project.  Already happening.

OpenBSD's pf has had stateful NAT66 for many years...

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca


Current thread: