nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Lamar Owen <lowen () pari edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:29:12 -0500
On Thursday, February 03, 2011 02:55:39 pm Jack Bates wrote:
Do you think we have to have a standard for them to implement it? If they can ignore the CPE router rules, they can implement NAT66 on their own, too.
See the map66 Sourceforge.net project. Already happening.
Current thread:
- RE: quietly...., (continued)
- RE: quietly.... Brian Johnson (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Simon Perreault (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Randy Carpenter (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Lamar Owen (Feb 03)