nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: sthaug () nethelp no
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:11:35 +0100 (CET)
I'm perfectly happy with an IPv6 network that only has rational people on it while those who insist on NAT stay behind on IPv4.
There's an inherent conflict between your wish here and the desire to bring IPv6 to the masses... Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug () nethelp no
Current thread:
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI, (continued)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jack Bates (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... sthaug (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- RE: quietly.... Frank Bulk (Feb 13)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Chris Adams (Feb 02)