nanog mailing list archives
Re: quietly....
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:28:00 -0600
On 2/3/2011 2:12 PM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Actually, I must agree that since I've stopped doing IT work professionally, I've found myself far less emotionally invested in this kind of thing, and far less worried about the world ending (which, let's face it, it rarely does). Does wonders for the blood pressure.
I used to say that if I won the lottery, I'd still keep my job (as I love it). Dealing with IPv6 and the fact that decades apparently isn't enough for a standards body and a small set of corporations to design and implement a protocol which needs to do everything the old one did (minimum) and more (advisable), I've recently reconsidered.
Here's to winning the Lottery. Then I won't need the Internet. :) jack
Current thread:
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI, (continued)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jay Ashworth (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Jack Bates (Feb 07)
- Re: Failure modes: NAT vs SPI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 07)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jon Lewis (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... Matthew Huff (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Matthew Palmer (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jack Bates (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Jay Ashworth (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... sthaug (Feb 03)
- RE: quietly.... david raistrick (Feb 03)
- Re: quietly.... Mark Andrews (Feb 02)
- RE: quietly.... Frank Bulk (Feb 13)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Iljitsch van Beijnum (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Nick Hilliard (Feb 02)
- Re: quietly.... Owen DeLong (Feb 02)