nanog mailing list archives
Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS
From: Diogo Montagner <diogo.montagner () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:33:48 +0800
Hi Chris, I never got this answer. Chris, Tim, Anton and Martin, thank you for all inputs. Really appreciate them. Thanks ./diogo -montagner On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Anton Kapela <tkapela () gmail com> wrote:On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Diogo Montagner <diogo.montagner () gmail com> wrote:Hello, I am looking for industry standard parameters to base the SLA of one network regarding to voice, video and data application.One won't find many, but a common rule of thumb is most apps will be 'fine' with networks that provide 10E-6 BER or lower loss rates.out of pure curiosity, have you ever gotten a reasonable answer when asking a carrier about this? I can imagine a sale-rep's brain essentially exploding upon asking it. Additionally 'the network' is not 'the path my packets take' ... so what number are you really getting here? -Chris
Current thread:
- SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Diogo Montagner (Feb 24)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Martin Hepworth (Feb 24)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Anton Kapela (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Diogo Montagner (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS William Herrin (Feb 28)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Anton Kapela (Feb 28)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS William Herrin (Feb 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Tim Jackson (Feb 27)