nanog mailing list archives
Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS
From: Martin Hepworth <maxsec () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:27:30 +0000
I'd be looking at packet ordering perhaps for voice and esp video, having the packets arrive in order makes a huge difference for video On Friday, 25 February 2011, Diogo Montagner <diogo.montagner () gmail com> wrote:
Hello, I am looking for industry standard parameters to base the SLA of one network regarding to voice, video and data application. Which are the the accepted values for jiiter, delay, latency and packet loss for voice, video and data in a IP/MPLS ? Thanks ./diogo -montagner
-- -- Martin Hepworth Oxford, UK
Current thread:
- SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Diogo Montagner (Feb 24)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Martin Hepworth (Feb 24)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Anton Kapela (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Diogo Montagner (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Christopher Morrow (Feb 27)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS William Herrin (Feb 28)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Anton Kapela (Feb 28)
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS William Herrin (Feb 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SLA for voice and video over IP/MPLS Tim Jackson (Feb 27)