Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

[Benson Schliesser <bensons () queuefull net>]

On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Jack Bates wrote:

> On 2/9/2011 5:56 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
> > Or 6rd and go native on their permanent prefix as the forklift upgrade
> > schedule allows.  Oh well, it's better than nothing or Crummier Grade NAT.
>
> ds-lite tends to be friendlier LSN from various tests, and is native v6.

DS-lite is still CGN.

You may be thinking of the comparison versus NAT444 described in draft-donley-nat444-impacts 
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-donley-nat444-impacts/).  But you should read the criticisms of that draft on 
the BEHAVE mailing list, http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave/current/msg09027.html and 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave/current/msg09030.html.

Cheers,
-Benson