Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

Try looking for the expanded terms:

Large Scale NAT
Carrier Grade NAT
NAT444

Owen

On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:58 AM, david raistrick wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Scott Helms wrote:
>
> > For ISPs in this circumstance the choice will be CGNAT rather than IPv6 for a number of years because the cost is 
> > much lower and according to the vendors selling CGNAT solutions the impact to end users is (almost) unnoticeable.
>
> Anyone care to define CGNAT?  Google results for this are either unrelated or "CGNAT will save us" or "CGNAT doesnt 
> count" - no rfcs, no explainations, nothing....
>
>
>
> --
> david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais () icantclick org             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html